W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Re-using and labelling other people's terms

From: Andreas Gebhardt <andreasgebhardt@web.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 21:01:55 +0100
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Message-ID: <jb623j$rfv$1@dough.gmane.org>
> And Jeremy's logic also applies to owl:sameAs.  I.e., if people don't
> like it, they don't need to believe you.  So if you have reviewed the
> dangers of using owl:sameAs inappropriately
> http://www.slideshare.net/jpmccusker/owlsameas-considered-harmful-to-prov
> enance and you still think it is semantically correct for your purposes,
> then go ahead and use it.

an example of owl:sameAs usage were resources obviously *not* the same


run the following query on http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql

 	construct { dbpedia:Cytochrome_c owl:sameAs ?o }
 	where { dbpedia:Cytochrome_c owl:sameAs ?o }

a subset of the result is like

<http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/drugbank/resource/targets/4967> .
<http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/drugbank/resource/targets/3221> .

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytochrome_c> .

get one more information leeds to

a) 	<http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/drugbank/resource/targets/4967>
b) 	<http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/drugbank/resource/targets/3221>

a) Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 complete genome; segment 8/16
   *source organism: Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009*
b) Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 11607 cytochrome c4 preprotein (CC4) gene,
complete cds
   *source organism: Pseudomonas stutzeri*

i think there *not* the same

	"Rhodopseudomonas palustris" - "Pseudomonas stutzeri"

Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 09:34:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:30 UTC