> And Jeremy's logic also applies to owl:sameAs. I.e., if people don't > like it, they don't need to believe you. So if you have reviewed the > dangers of using owl:sameAs inappropriately > http://www.slideshare.net/jpmccusker/owlsameas-considered-harmful-to-prov > enance and you still think it is semantically correct for your purposes, > then go ahead and use it. an example of owl:sameAs usage were resources obviously *not* the same -------------------- run the following query on http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql construct { dbpedia:Cytochrome_c owl:sameAs ?o } where { dbpedia:Cytochrome_c owl:sameAs ?o } a subset of the result is like <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cytochrome_c> <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs> <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/drugbank/resource/targets/4967> . <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cytochrome_c> <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#sameAs> <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/drugbank/resource/targets/3221> . btw. <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Cytochrome_c> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/page> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytochrome_c> . get one more information leeds to a) <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/drugbank/resource/targets/4967> drugbank:genbankIdGenePage <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?val=BX572600> b) <http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/drugbank/resource/targets/3221> drugbank:genbankIdGenePage <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/viewer.fcgi?val=U05988> a) Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 complete genome; segment 8/16 *source organism: Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009* b) Pseudomonas stutzeri ATCC 11607 cytochrome c4 preprotein (CC4) gene, complete cds *source organism: Pseudomonas stutzeri* i think there *not* the same "Rhodopseudomonas palustris" - "Pseudomonas stutzeri" AndreasReceived on Thursday, 1 December 2011 09:34:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:26 UTC