- From: Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:02:25 +0200
- To: tom.heath@talis.com
- Cc: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>, Semantic Web at W3C <semantic-web@w3.org>
Right. My interest has shifted slightly, away from the mechanics towards applications. Evangelism directed at people who are currently doing NoSQL and relational databases also seems important (even if it’s not research-worthy). Axel On Apr 20, 2011, at 13:13 , Tom Heath wrote: > Hi guys, > > FWIW I think there is a key distinction between a "Web of Data" and > "data on the Web". Much as I wanted to love Microformats (to pick one > example), when I tried to use them in anger I became frustrated at the > seeming lack of the 'linkiness' we need to truly connect data records > on the Web (or strictly speaking 'connect things described by data > records on the Web). Linked Data addresses this, which is one of the > reasons I'm such a fan. > > That said, I'm not sure of the real need for a shared definition. > Isn't this a case of "each to their own" - something the Web is really > good for? Everyone is welcome to their own interpretation, and if > Sindice takes a very inclusive attitude to different data > formats/models then that's your free choice. Ultimately though, aren't > we all just better off getting on and building a Web of Data, whatever > definition we choose, than spending our precious time debating the > term? > > Cheers, > > Tom. > > On 19 April 2011 12:04, Giovanni Tummarello > <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am writing here since i came across a few recent "foundational >> style" publications on the topic that give a definition of "web of >> data" basically as SameAs of LOD - also specifying, in avoidance of >> doubt, that the LOD community started the web of data. >> >> I wish to preserve and make clear the difference between "Web of Data" >> approaches such as Sindice.com (or anyone dealing with web markup >> really, Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Goodrelations ecommerce etc) and the >> technicalities that LOD considers fundamental requisites. >> >> In our definition . (e.g. see the very beginning of the video at >> http://sig.ma ). the Web of Data,is the web made of pages that exposes >> machine processable content definited according to some metadata >> standard. So RDF, RDFa, Microformats, but also XML using notable >> schemas. Of course LOD is part of it. >> >> In our view the *all these formats* do indeed serve the purpose of web >> scale data interoperability and aggregation. All these allow shared >> understandings thanks to shared vocabularies, so the differences are >> mostly syntactic and can easily be converted and integrated with >> similar, general tools. [1] discusses a bit more the vision, though >> not specifically about this. >> >> This is clearly outside LOD (it is indeed a vast superset). But i >> really apologize if we have used this term wrong so far. >> >> I will appreciate and change the term if there is vaste feeling htat >> there would be no web of data without lod. >> Otherwise maybe those who mean LOD can call it LOD? :) >> >> please advice. >> >> thanks in advance. >> Gio & Renaud >> >> [1] "Publishing Data that Links Itself: A Conjecture" by G. Tummarello R.Delbru >> http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS10/paper/download/1189/1467 >> >> > > > > -- > Dr Tom Heath > Lead Researcher > Talis Systems Ltd > W: http://www.talis.com/ > W: http://tomheath.com/id/me > > Talis Systems Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales. > Registered number: 07196440. Registered office: 6190 Knights Court, > Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB, United Kingdom. > > -- Dr. Axel Rauschmayer axel@rauschma.de twitter.com/rauschma home: rauschma.de blog: 2ality.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 14:02:53 UTC