also, in reading this interesting background article http://www2.fiu.edu/~ganapati/6710/2.pdf I learn about the Data Quality Act 2006, of which I was not aware until now worth a study perhaps http://www.state.gov/misc/49492.htm On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote: > All, > > Apologies for cross posting this repeatedly. I think I have a typo free > heading for this topic. > > Increasingly, the issue of data quality pops up as an impediment to Linked > Data value proposition comprehension and eventual exploitation. The same > issue even appears to emerge in conversations that relate to "sense making" > endeavors that benefit from things such as OWL reasoning e.g., when > resolving the multiple Identifiers with a common Referent via owl:sameAs or > exploitation of fuzzy rules based on InverseFunctionProperty relations. > > Personally, I subscribe to the doctrine that "data quality" is like > "beauty" it lies strictly in the eyes of the beholder i.e., a function of > said beholders "context lenses". > > I am posting primarily to open up a discussion thread for this important > topic. > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > President& CEO > OpenLink Software > Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen > > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2011 13:05:48 UTC