- From: Michael F Uschold <uschold@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:59:11 -0700
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Message-ID: <BANLkTimvgTaBMFJepMHCBcuxHoh3HOdtzw@mail.gmail.com>
> I subscribe to the doctrine that "data quality" is like "beauty" it lies strictly in the eyes of the beholder Interesting position. Seems a bit post-modernesque... I think there is some truth here, just like beauty in a program, or an building architecture, or an ontology -- people defninitely have different opinions. However, IMHO, it would be dangerous to conclude that all or even the significant majority of issues of data quality are just matters of opinion. This would prevent doing the hard work of identifying some core principles that most people can agree on most of the time. I bet there are many many cases where you could ask people of diverse opinions and get clear agreement by asking the simple question: is this data high or low quality? So maybe its like porn, you can't define it, but most people agree when it is or isn't. Michael On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote: > All, > > Apologies for cross posting this repeatedly. I think I have a typo free > heading for this topic. > > Increasingly, the issue of data quality pops up as an impediment to Linked > Data value proposition comprehension and eventual exploitation. The same > issue even appears to emerge in conversations that relate to "sense making" > endeavors that benefit from things such as OWL reasoning e.g., when > resolving the multiple Identifiers with a common Referent via owl:sameAs or > exploitation of fuzzy rules based on InverseFunctionProperty relations. > > Personally, I subscribe to the doctrine that "data quality" is like > "beauty" it lies strictly in the eyes of the beholder i.e., a function of > said beholders "context lenses". > > I am posting primarily to open up a discussion thread for this important > topic. > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > President& CEO > OpenLink Software > Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen > > > > > > > -- Michael Uschold, PhD Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu Skype, Twitter: UscholdM
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 01:01:59 UTC