- From: glenn mcdonald <glenn@furia.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:05:08 -0400
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BANLkTinL85XhDr6oDCXhMO6t1HfwF7gCXg@mail.gmail.com>
> > I am demonstrating and talking about what Virtuoso infrastructure enables.. > You're talking about it, and you're *trying* to demonstrate it. But your demonstrations are consistently undermined by other factors you consider irrelevant. Nonsense. See http://jeffjonas.typepad.com/IRAHSS_Expert_Counting.pdf, > > Again, I've discussed these matters with Jeff and this is not about perfect > numbers. > "Perfect" is hardly the issue here. I encourage people to read the paper. which summarizes itself like this: "This article suggests that the single > most fundamental capability required to make a sensemaking system is the > system’s ability to recognise when multiple references to the same entity > (often from different source systems) are in fact the same entity." dbpedia > as a dataset fails this test badly. > > And how on earth does that have anything to do with Counting? > I encourage *you* to read the paper, too. Not sure what you mean by "exhibit" here. Your queries timeout, so unless >> the needle happens to be in the first page of the haystack, you're not going >> to find it. >> >> >> No they don't and that's where we just will not connect. You've already >> seen our browser pages that do just that, and your next response will >> ultimately take us back to arguing about page aesthetics. >> > > Sorry, I can't follow this response. By "no they don't" do you mean that > your queries *don't* timeout? They certainly do when I try them. > > > You can actually issue SPARQL with timeouts. Do you not remember the > conversation about partial aggregates in ad-hoc queries using SPARQL or SQL? > That's what I am talking about. What we call "Anytime Query" [1] as a > critical technique for ad-hoc queries at infinite scale [2]. > And as I've said before, this is an impressive technical accomplishment. But it's not always helpful for people. If I have to page through 20 straws of hay at a time, that's not what I mean by searching the haystack. > The folks on this mailing list understand why RPIs dataset is loaded to the > LOD cloud and what it means. > Perhaps so. Somebody want to describe the practical use they're making of this data?
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 01:30:35 UTC