- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:55:15 +0200
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Michael F Uschold <uschold@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <BANLkTimUog7wc6JqsHtG5T=FHkpG2QcRvw@mail.gmail.com>
I'm with Richard on this rNews is a functional ontology, which means intended for a functional purpose : tag news. In this context having Organization, Person and Location subclasses of rnews:Tag makes perfect sense. If you declare in your ontology ex:Person owl:disjointWith rnews:Tag it means that you don't want to tag news with your instances of ex:Person. So what? That's what you want. I don't see any problem with that. I'm sure no big problem would come from something like rnews:Person rdfs:subClassOf foaf:Person. foaf:Person does not make any strong assumption on what a Person is, that's why it's so easily reused. A rnews:Person is a foaf:Person who happens to be used for tagging news. Certainly that will make some reasoners crash at some point if they try to make consistent too many things at a time. In a more restricted scope of FYN applications, it will be very useful. For example I have a data base of people using foaf:Person I can scrap rNews to populate it. I don't care if a rnews:Person is a Tag or not, but am happy to identify a foaf:Person when I meet her in the news. Interpret what makes sense to you, ignore the rest. Best Bernard 2011/4/6 Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> > Hi Michael, > > On 6 Apr 2011, at 03:48, Michael F Uschold wrote: > > I had a look at the ontology and discovered that a) it does not load into > Protégé 4.1. and b) An organization and a location and a person are all > tags. This seems likely to cause semantic problems if you want to > interoperate with any other data out there. > > For example, someone is likely to say > http://iptc.org/std/rNews/2011-02-02#Organization is owl:sameAs the URI > for organization from say DBpedia or the CIA World Fact Book. Now all these > are going to be inferred to be of type > http://iptc.org/std/rNews/2011-02-02#Tag. This will give an inconsistent > ontology when someone does the sensible things and says a location and an > person are disjoint from tags. > > > > A tag is an informational indexing thing. An organization is a legal > entity, a location is something else again. > > And I thought a tag is a small, flat, metal thing on a dog collar… > > rnews:Tag doesn't have to be the same as michael:Tag. That's why we name > things with URIs. > > If it is useful *for some application* to declare rnews:Organization > owl:equivalentClass ex:Organization in their own local application-specific > ontology mapping, then ex:Organization and rnews:Tag are not disjoint *in > that mapping*. That's fine. All mappings are wrong, but some are useful. > > The Web will never be globally consistent and you know that. > > Best, > Richard > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > <!-- http://iptc.org/std/rNews/2011-02-02#Organization > > --> > > > > <owl:Class rdf:about="#Organization"> > > <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Party"/> > > </owl:Class> > > > > > > > > <!-- > > http://iptc.org/std/rNews/2011-02-02#Party > > --> > > > > <owl:Class rdf:about="#Party"> > > <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="#Tag"/> > > </owl:Class> > > > > > > semantic-web@w3.org > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> > > Date: 2011/4/5 > > Subject: ANN: IPTC releases first draft of the rNews standard for > embedding metadata in online news > > To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org> > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > Short Story: > > ------------ > > - IPTC has released today the rNews standard draft, see > http://dev.iptc.org/rNews > > - rNews aims at marking news using RDFa. The standard will be compliant > with NewsMLG2, IPTC’s XML format for multimedia news packages > > - IPTC considers incorporating hNews into its set of standards > > - rNews will be machine readable, an OWL/RDF version of the vocabulary > is being cooked > > > > IPTC is requesting _NOW_ feedback from the community, via its dedicated > forum, http://dev.iptc.org/Forum-1. The IPTC will consider any feedback > posted until 30 April 2011 as input to the final standardization process. > > > > Long Story: > > ----------- > > Publishers large and small struggle to make sure that search engines and > social media sites find their stories and refer to them appropriately. > > > > They want to provide highly targeted adverts while dealing with users who > are opposed to the privacy implication of sharing the personal data > necessary to accomplish that. > > > > How can they build web pages with news stories where the components of > the story are machine-readable, as well as human readable? The rich content > metadata available in a publisher’s internal CMS is often lost, or > re-engineered in an attempt to optimise search results. > > > > The IPTC has taken a step to solving this problem with the release of the > first draft of the rNews standard in 5 April 2011. > > > > The IPTC aims to revamp the process for marking up online news articles > so that search engines and social networking sites can more successfully > pull relevant pieces of data from them. IPTC seeks to develop rNews, a > recently proposed practice for marking news using RDFa, which allows HTML > authors to tag webpage content with indicators that browsers and tools can > interpret. The standards will be compliant with NewsMLG2, IPTC’s XML format > for multimedia news packages. > > > > IPTC’s Semantic Web Working Group is leading the charge to craft these > standards. The group is mapping out the specifications essential to rNews > for IPTC, and will offer examples of the standards in use, best practices > for implementation, and online tools to ease the transition to the new > standards. This work is set to conclude in the summer of 2011, and will > better enable search engines to cull NewsML-G2 data from the Internet, ready > for Semantic Web and Linked Data mining technologies. > > > > Details of rNews are available at http://dev.iptc.org/rNews. > > > > More importantly, what you think about it can be recorded on the public > rNews forum (http://dev.iptc.org/Forum-1) . The IPTC will consider any > feedback posted until 30 April 2011 as input to the final standardization > process. > > > > The IPTC considers incorporating hNews, the existing microformat for the > semantic markup of news content, into its set of standards. > > At its most basic level, both hNews and rNews are about expressing news > metadata in HTML. > > hNews is a microformat using HTML markup conventions, whereas rNews is a > method to record RDF assertions (triples) within HTML, but keeps > vocabularies and expression mechanism separate. > > > > Best regards. > > > > Raphaël Troncy > > on behalf of the IPTC SemWeb working group > > > > -- > > Raphaël Troncy > > EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department > > 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. > > e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > > Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 > > Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 > > Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Michael Uschold, PhD > > Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts > > LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu > > Skype, Twitter: UscholdM > > > > > -- Bernard Vatant Senior Consultant Vocabulary & Data Engineering Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459 Mail: bernard.vatant@mondeca.com ---------------------------------------------------- Mondeca 3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France Web: http://www.mondeca.com Blog: http://mondeca.wordpress.com ----------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 12:55:45 UTC