- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 04:43:22 +0100
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Personally I think the uc&r are reasonably well understood, though it can't hurt to capture them. It's not so much designing a solution as agreeing some conventions around what people already do. - Steve Sent on the move. On 4 Apr 2011, at 02:34, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > All, > > I've created a skeleton wiki page for collecting use case and > requirements for skolomizing bnodes: > http://www.w3.org/wiki/BnodeSkolomization > I encourage all who are interested to add their use cases and > requirements. > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:21 +0530, Ivan Herman wrote: >> David, >> >> are all those metadata necessary at all? > > That depends on the use case. *I* don't think they are necessarily, > but I was specifically trying to avoid making too many assumptions about > other people's use cases until requirements have been collected together > in one place and we can see how they fit together. > > I think some good brainstorming has been done here on the list, but I > think if we are going to actually start designing a solution then the > requirements really should be collected first. > > > -- > David Booth, Ph.D. > http://dbooth.org/ > > Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily > reflect those of his employer. >
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 03:44:05 UTC