- From: Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:00:25 +0200
- To: Svatopluk Šperka <sperka@gmail.com>
- CC: semantic-web@w3c.org
Hello Svatopluk, Am 26.10.2010 00:47, schrieb Svatopluk Šperka: > There are rules rdfs4a and rdf4b which state that subject and object of > every triple are resources. Not really of every triple. You have to take into account the convention stipulated at the beginning of Section 7: "These rules all use the following conventions: aaa, bbb, etc., stand for any URI reference, i.e. any possible predicate of a triple; uuu, vvv, etc. for any URI reference or blank node identifier, i.e any possible subject of a triple; xxx, yyy etc. for any URI reference, blank node identifier or literal, i.e. any possible subject or object of a triple; lll for any literal; and _:nnn, etc., for blank node identifiers." i.e. rules rdfs4a and rdfs4b exclude literals. Literals simply are not of type rdfs:Resource according to the current specification. There's a long thread about a closely related problem on this mailing list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Jun/thread.html#msg309 > These rules seem to me as special cases of rdfs2 and rdfs3 which are > saying that subject/object of a triple can be assinged a type according > to defined domain/range of a property in a triple. Only condition is > that It would have to be given that for every property, its domain and > range is class of all resources. ... which is not true, see above. Regards, Jakub
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 13:01:22 UTC