- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:42:26 +0100
- To: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTim4ogJZDPBBwmwMveAjTTjVMpiBHk0Zo=MGap6n@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ken I am facing a similar issue trying work out how to best model a vocabulary using SKOS,but the primer did not address my issues http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-primer/ I am informed by Antoine I that there is a SKOS mailing list where to post specific questions but I may not have capacity to join http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/mail Please let us know if you learn something, I ll share with you my notes offlist in case you can add wisdom PDM On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Laskey, Ken <klaskey@mitre.org> wrote: > > I am looking to define a controlled vocabulary that contains a list of > description elements. Values will be associated with the individual > description elements, where some of values should be constrained by other > controlled vocabularies. For example, my description set contains (length, > weight, color) and color is to be constrained to (red, yellow, blue). > > I was looking to represent this in SKOS. My thoughts were: > > - The descriptive elements would each be SKOS Concepts > > - The set of description elements forming the controlled > vocabulary would be a SKOS Concept Scheme > > - The controlled values would a SKOS Collection. > > What I am missing is how to say a given description element in one > controlled vocabulary, e.g. a SKOS Concept Scheme, can be constrained to a > list of values, e.g. a SKOS Collection. I was considering rdfs:range but > I’m not sure that is applicable. > > I was surprised that the SKOS examples I found on the Web don’t mention > this. Am I missing something fundamental? > > Ken > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr. Kenneth Laskey > MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 > 7515 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 > McLean VA 22102-7508 > > >
Received on Saturday, 9 October 2010 17:42:53 UTC