- From: Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:23:20 -0800
- To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- CC: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4CDC7AE8.2040909@topquadrant.com>
Hi David what does an RDFa document return, 200 or 210? or maybe somewhere in between (depending on how much RDFa :) ) Jeremy On 11/10/2010 2:26 PM, David Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > Apologies for cross-posting, but I am curious what the membership of > this distribution thinks about the practical difficulties associated > with the use of 303 redirection and the problems explaining it to > non-SemWebbers. At the risk of drawing others into an already active > debate on another list, your feedback would be welcome. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> *From: *David Wood <david@3roundstones.com >> <mailto:david@3roundstones.com>> >> *Date: *November 10, 2010 17:15:36 EST >> *To: *Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org >> <mailto:public-lod@w3.org>> >> *Subject: **A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects* >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've collected my thoughts on The Great 303 Debate of 2010 (as it >> will be remembered) at: >> http://prototypo.blogspot.com/2010/11/another-guide-to-publishing-linked-data.html >> >> Briefly, I propose a new HTTP status code (210 Description Found) to >> disambiguate between generic information resources and the special >> class of information resources that provide metadata descriptions >> about URIs addressed. >> >> My proposal is basically the same as posted earlier to this list, but >> significantly updated to include a mechanism to allow for the >> publication of Linked Data using a new HTTP status code on Web >> hosting services. Several poorly thought out corner cases were also >> dealt with. >> >> I look forward to feedback from the community. However, if you are >> about to say something like, "the Web is just fine as it is", then I >> will have little patience. We invent the Web as we go and need not >> be artificially constrained. The Semantic Web is still young enough >> to be done right (or "more right", or maybe "somewhat right"). >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 23:23:45 UTC