Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

Hi David

what does an RDFa document return, 200 or 210?
  or maybe somewhere in between (depending on how much RDFa :) )

Jeremy

On 11/10/2010 2:26 PM, David Wood wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies for cross-posting, but I am curious what the membership of 
> this distribution thinks about the practical difficulties associated 
> with the use of 303 redirection and the problems explaining it to 
> non-SemWebbers.  At the risk of drawing others into an already active 
> debate on another list, your feedback would be welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> *From: *David Wood <david@3roundstones.com 
>> <mailto:david@3roundstones.com>>
>> *Date: *November 10, 2010 17:15:36 EST
>> *To: *Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org 
>> <mailto:public-lod@w3.org>>
>> *Subject: **A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects*
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've collected my thoughts on The Great 303 Debate of 2010 (as it 
>> will be remembered) at:
>> http://prototypo.blogspot.com/2010/11/another-guide-to-publishing-linked-data.html
>>
>> Briefly, I propose a new HTTP status code (210 Description Found) to 
>> disambiguate between generic information resources and the special 
>> class of information resources that provide metadata descriptions 
>> about URIs addressed.
>>
>> My proposal is basically the same as posted earlier to this list, but 
>> significantly updated to include a mechanism to allow for the 
>> publication of Linked Data using a new HTTP status code on Web 
>> hosting services.  Several poorly thought out corner cases were also 
>> dealt with.
>>
>> I look forward to feedback from the community.  However, if you are 
>> about to say something like, "the Web is just fine as it is", then I 
>> will have little patience.  We invent the Web as we go and need not 
>> be artificially constrained.  The Semantic Web is still young enough 
>> to be done right (or "more right", or maybe "somewhat right").
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 23:23:45 UTC