W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > November 2010

Re: RDF URI References

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 11:28:24 -0400
To: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
Cc: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>, nathan@webr3.org, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1288884504.2123.30.camel@waldron>
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 14:03 +0000, Damian Steer wrote:
> On 04/11/10 14:00, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> > Le 04/11/2010 14:54, Nathan a écrit :
> 
> >> Makes sense, so, many recent docs, formal and informal, mention
> >> explicitly "URI Reference" rather than "RDF URI Reference", "URI" or
> >> "IRI" - for future docs which term should be used?
> >
> > I guess IRI should be the best choice. BTW, the OWL 2 specifications
> > exclusively rely on IRIs in place where OWL 1 was using URIs and URI
> > references.
> 
> +1.
> 
> SPARQL uses IRI [1]

As does RIF.

     -- Sandro

> 
> Damian
> 
> [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#QSynIRI>
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 15:28:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:21 UTC