On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 14:03 +0000, Damian Steer wrote: > On 04/11/10 14:00, Antoine Zimmermann wrote: > > Le 04/11/2010 14:54, Nathan a écrit : > > >> Makes sense, so, many recent docs, formal and informal, mention > >> explicitly "URI Reference" rather than "RDF URI Reference", "URI" or > >> "IRI" - for future docs which term should be used? > > > > I guess IRI should be the best choice. BTW, the OWL 2 specifications > > exclusively rely on IRIs in place where OWL 1 was using URIs and URI > > references. > > +1. > > SPARQL uses IRI [1] As does RIF. -- Sandro > > Damian > > [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#QSynIRI> > > >Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 15:28:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:21 UTC