- From: Chris Dollin <chris.dollin@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 08:30:25 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 04:51:40 pm Jitao Yang wrote:
> 2010/5/19 Chris Dollin <chris.dollin@epimorphics.com>
>
> > On Wednesday 19 May 2010 01:39:52 pm Jitao Yang wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > In reference to http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/,
> > > suppose we define:
> > > "... the formula DescPr(*d, p, o*) , asserting that object o is a value
> > of
> > > property p in description *d*. ..."
> > >
> > > and we have:
> > > DescPr(*d, p, o*)
> > > DescPr(*d', p, o'*)
> > >
> > > the above formula could be represented by RDF like:
> > >
> > > :d
> > > a :DescPr_description ;
> > > :has_property :p .
> > >
> > > :d'
> > > a :DescPr_description ;
> > > :has_property :p .
> > >
> > > :p
> > > a :DescPr_property ;
> > > :has_value :o ;
> > > :has_value :o' .
> > >
> > > >From these triples how can we go back in a unique way to the logical
> > > representation.
> >
> > I don't think you can, and I think that's because it's not a good
> > representation (and vice-versa).
> >
> > I wasn't sure which bit of http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/
> > you were comparing/contrasting to.
> >
>
>
> I reference to case1 and case3 together from
> http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/,
> what is your idea of representing the formula using RDF?
I'd use case3, which seems the most natural to me for this
example, or perhaps case1 with a predicate-centric approach.
case3:
[a Formula; relation p; on d; value o].
[a Formula; relation p; on d', value o'].
case 1:
p assertion [on d; value o], [on d'; value o']
Depending, of course, on what the conext was that I was working in.
--
"The process will be long and ... unreliable." Box, /Star Cops/
Epimorphics Ltd
Registered address: C/O Robson Taylor, Froomsgate House, Bristol
Registered number: 7016688
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 07:31:58 UTC