- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 20:54:35 +0200
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
Hi all, how come the OWL Ontology itself is defined as <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl>, and not <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>? The latter (hash URI, ending in "#") is linked to, via rdfs:isDefinedBy, for all classes and properties, but the former is the resource described as the owl:Ontology. Is this really intentional? It seems to conflate the document and the ontology. And ontologies aren't considered to be information resources, are they? Neither classes and properties are, nor is the thing linked to via isDefinedBy (itself not described further in the document). Also notice that neither RDF nor RDFS are described like this -- they both use the hash URI as identifier for the Ontology (also linked to with rdfs:isDefinedBy from their classes/properties). Best regards, Niklas
Received on Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:55:27 UTC