- From: Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:04:48 +0200
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Svante Schubert <Svante.Schubert@sun.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Manos Batsis wrote: > Danny Ayers wrote: >> But Damian, what do you think about literals as resources? >> >> From my limited perspective, it seems like all the places in the >> triple should have equal weighting - but I could be very wrong about >> that. >> >> On a perfect world, everything would have a URI (/IRI) but these lumps >> of text - what do you reckon? > > Bingo. So if one wants to emulate the flexibility of XTM, all that is > required to do it in RDF is to promote literals to subjects using URIs. > For example "foobar" can be http://my-literal-to-subject.com/foobar PS: One may want to use the XSD datatype URIs as a base instead of the one i made up above? Cheers, MAnos
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 11:12:11 UTC