*grin* But Damian, what do you think about literals as resources? >From my limited perspective, it seems like all the places in the triple should have equal weighting - but I could be very wrong about that. On a perfect world, everything would have a URI (/IRI) but these lumps of text - what do you reckon? Love, Danny. On 1 March 2010 19:02, Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com> wrote: > > On 1 Mar 2010, at 17:55, David Booth wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 22:19 +0000, Damian Steer wrote: > >> > >> Hi Svante, > >> > >> This is a rather tricky question, but I think the simplest answer is: > you can't do that. A literal can't be an object > >> > >> ( The more accurate answer is that a literal can be an object, but you > can't write that directly in rdf syntax. For example: > > > > Right, however the word "object" may be a bit confusing here, as it is > > overloaded. > > You're very kind, but I think I was simply wrong here :-) SUBJECT was the > term I was thinking of, but something went wrong between brain and keyboard. > > Damian > > -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 19:01:38 UTC