- From: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:29:54 +0200
- To: Silvio Peroni <speroni@cs.unibo.it>
- Cc: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@cnr.it>, Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D4EC89E5-219E-4587-99E9-6808AEA2D16A@cnr.it>
Yes, I like the SWAN ontology ... I remember sometimes ago I wanted to modularize it and submit the modules as design patterns :). Consider that, besides the typing problem in OLO, there is a difference between OLO and SWAN in that OLO allows for "slots" that enable a designer to assign indexes to items directly, while SWAN does not have indexes, although they can be inferred with a query over the "swan:nextItem" property. SWAN has the advantage of making a clear distinction between sets, bags and lists. In principle, with a RIF rule added to SWAN (or a SPARQL/SPIN add-on), you can get the same results as in OLO, while being able to reason with transitivity over a sequence relation in a list. Considering sequencing, it'd be nice to decouple transitivity and intransitivity (easier queries and rules), cf. the "sequence" design pattern in ODP [3]. [3] http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/sequence.owl On 28 Jun 2010, at 15:08, Silvio Peroni wrote: > Hi Aldo, > >> Hi Bob, I like the basic idea here because it matches a real modelling need to represent ordered collections/lists. >> A vocabulary for that can be submitted as a design patterns on ODP [1] for public utility. > > An OWL ontology describing ordered/non-ordered collections [1] has been published by Paolo Ciccarese for SWAN [2]. I think it is enough general to be considered a kind of pattern for handling these scenarios, isn't it? > > Best, > > S. > > > [1] - http://swan.mindinformatics.org/spec/1.2/collections.html > [2] - http://swan.mindinformatics.org > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Silvio Peroni, Ph.D. student > Department of Computer Science > University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy) > +39 051 2094871 > speroni@cs.unibo.it – http://palindrom.es/phd > _____________________________________ Aldo Gangemi Senior Researcher Semantic Technology Lab (STLab) Institute for Cognitive Science and Technology, National Research Council (ISTC-CNR) Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma, Italy Tel: +390644161535 Fax: +390644161513 aldo.gangemi@cnr.it http://www.stlab.istc.cnr.it http://www.istc.cnr.it/createhtml.php?nbr=71 skype aldogangemi
Received on Monday, 28 June 2010 14:30:34 UTC