RE: What is it that's wrong with rdf:List

Pat Hayes wrote:

It might be simpler to just let OWL have rdf:List and modify RDF
>by using a new vocabulary for general use.

Please don't forget that some final (or almost final) standards already make
use of RDF lists as semantic entities. I know at least of SKOS ("Concept
Collections"; see Chap. 9 of [1]) and RIF (Sec. of [2]). And if it
is true that the SPARQL 1.1 folks also start thinking about supporting
general usage of RDF lists...



[1] <>
[2] <>

Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel  : +49-721-9654-726
Fax  : +49-721-9654-727
WWW  :
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor,
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus

Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 22:04:30 UTC