- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 08:39:12 +0100
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
I note that an IETF working group last-call has been issued for version 4.0 of vCard, including an XML version of same: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav/current/msg01490.html There is an RDF version of vCard: http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/ which I am assuming the authors intend to update at some stage. I have a particular question about the RDF version: apart from the ongoing debate about the desirability of http- vs non-http URIs for namespaces, is there any particular reason to not use the name namespace URI for the RDF version and the IETF XML version? With a few intermediate nodes, I think the XML version would map pretty directly to RDF, and could use the name namespace URIs, but can't decide if that would be asking for problems in the future. #g
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 06:23:23 UTC