- From: Michael Lang Jr. <michaelallenlang@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:33:49 -0400
- To: Pierre-Yves <pingou@pingoured.fr>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTik6ieS=GhTHjR8Dy=JMOX7ToQk2H94On=0RpzaE@mail.gmail.com>
Pierre, I would recommend that you, at least initially, build your own ontology. All use cases are slightly different and it is very unlikely that you will be able to find an ontology that meets your use case exactly. Also, you do not really get any immediate benefit by reusing an ontology. The only benefit comes when you want to link your data to other data that is described by the ontology you reuse. From your description, it does not sound like this is an immediate requirement for you. Building your own will save you a lot of time and trouble trying to scour the web for an existing one and it will give you the freedom and flexibility to build the ontology to do exactly what you want it to do. Later, if you decided you want to link your data up to other data (or someone else wants to do it for you), then you can worry about replacing your ontology with another ontology or mapping to another ontology. Once you have your ontology built and you use it for awhile, the process of mapping to another ontology will be much easier because you will have a very good understanding of the semantics of your project. Mike Lang Ontology Architect Revelytix, Inc. phone: 410-584-0009 (office) 443-928-3782 (cell) skype: michael.allen.lang.jr On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Pierre-Yves <pingou@pingoured.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I am fairly new to the semantic web technology and I am trying to create > my first rdf file. > I am trying to describe the project I am working on. This project is > basically a web-based database front end with some visualization tool > attached. This project has three instances which I of course would like > to describe as well. > > At the moment I have been using the doap ontology [1] to define my > project, I though I could you the same 'project' property to defined the > deployed instances but I have been advised on irc (#swig) not to do so > but rather to try to define them as 'deployedInstance' or something > similar (I was told that 'isInstanceOf' might not be the best choice). > > Now I am trying to find an ontology which would have this property. > > My question is therefore, what is the best way to find an ontology ? Is > there a website which list the known semantic ontology and their > properties and would allow to search for one ? > > Of course I would be happy if someone has an idea on an ontology which > already has this property defined. > > > Best regards, > > Pierre > > [1] http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 13:34:24 UTC