Re: RDF Extensibility


> I agree with Pat in that case, that it would just be easier not to put restrictions
> in the abstract rdf syntax at all, instead of complicating things all over the place.
> There are pragmatic reasons why sentences such as 
> <> "name" "Henry" .
> are not going to be successful, the main one being that it is impossible to 
> adjudicate what the relation "name" refers to is about.

In that respect, "name" is not different than any URI one has never seen before. What about adding

"name" rdfs:subPropertyOf foaf:name .

to this example?


Received on Friday, 9 July 2010 07:29:55 UTC