Ivan Mikhailov wrote: > After 7 days of discussion, are there any volunteers to implement this > proposal? Or you specify the wish and I should implement it (and > Kingsley should pay) for an unclear purpose? Sorry, no. > > I should remind one more time: without two scheduled implementations > right now and two complete implementations at the CR time, the > discussion is just for fun. AFAIK - 'The RDF Semantics as stated works fine with triples which have any kind of syntactic node in any position in any combination.' - it's only the common serializations which define + cater for a subset of 'RDF' and prevent literal subjects. For a long time people have been telling me that RDF/XML is not RDF, if people have built their triple/quad stores on the understanding that specific serializations of RDF define RDF itself then..? I'd hope that RDF/XML and other common serializations don't change - but I'd also hope that in the near future we will have an RDF serialization which does handle literal subjects (& predicates) - at that time it will be a business decision for each company to decide whether to use and support it or not. Best, NathanReceived on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 17:33:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:19 UTC