- From: Henry Story <henry.story@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:03:10 +0200
- To: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>
- Cc: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Jeremy Carroll <jeremy@topquadrant.com>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, nathan@webr3.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 2 Jul 2010, at 11:57, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> On 7/2/2010 5:27 AM, Ian Davis wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Patrick Durusau<patrick@durusau.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I make this point in another post this morning but is your argument that
>>> investment by vendors =
>>>
>>>
>> I think I just answered it there, before reading this message. Let me
>> know if not!
>>
>>
> I think you made a very good point about needing examples so user can say: "I want to do that."
>
> Which was one of the strong points of HTML.
Ok, what users will want is the Social Web. And here is the way to convince people:
"The Social Network Privacy Mess: Why we Need the Social Web"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=994DvSJZyww&feature=channel
( This can of course be improved) The general ideas should be clear:
dystopia: we cannot have all social data centralised on one server.
utopia: there is a lot of money to be made in creating the social web, and thereby
increasing democracy in the world.
This can ONLY be done with linked data. And there is a real need for it.
Henry
Received on Friday, 2 July 2010 10:03:42 UTC