Pat, On 7/1/2010 11:14 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: > > <snip> > That is fine. Nobody mandates that your (or anyone else's) software > must be able to handle all cases of RDF. But to impose an irrational > limitation on a standard just because someone has spent a lot of money > is a very bad way to make progress, IMO. Although, I believe that > there are still people using COBOL, so you may have a point. > It was reported that the average American has nearly 4,000 interactions with COBOL based transaction systems per year. http://www.itjungle.com/tfh/tfh060109-story03.html So, yes, there are people still using COBOL. Hope you are having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusauReceived on Friday, 2 July 2010 09:34:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:19 UTC