W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2010

Re: predicates as verbs

From: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 18:06:53 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTinMH_htd8ZgwPCT-Cvse2By1VVZ3LnsPscp89dx@mail.gmail.com>
To: paoladimaio10@googlemail.com
Cc: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
Hi Paola

According to rdf semantics any UriRef used as predicate in s statement
is a rdf:Property. I'm wondering what the difference between
properties and verbs are and about the advantages of the latter
(unfortunately I cannot read that page via the link to google-doc).


On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not following close enough the discussion on subjects as literals , and
> whtere they contribute
> to the awkwardness of RDF
> One thing I remember finding it disorienting though, is that there is no
> rule that a predicate must be a verb
> (when I was looking at triple as if it were a subject- predicate- object
> model )
> In standard modelling practices  (E/R modeling) the relations tend to be
> verbs
> CF PAGE 196
> http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=1ftCwG4K-HEC&lpg=PA196&ots=FBX42Ms9Ys&dq=ENTITY%20RELATIONSHIP%20MODEL%20SENTENCE%20VERB%20RULE&pg=PA196#v=onepage&q&f=false
> I did bring this up on another list, and the engineers thought it would be
> good practice to
> restrict predicates to verbs for obvious reasons (obvious to anyone who does
> data models)
> Not sure how that would play if RDF is shown as  EAV (entity attribute
> value) rather thant SPO (subject predicate object)
> Just thought I d mention this, in case someone wants to fix RDF thats the
> first crack I spottend a while back
> cheers
Received on Thursday, 1 July 2010 16:07:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:18 UTC