Re: how to define that a relation is a dataype?

On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 10:19 -0800, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> [...] Real people don't type triples ... so there is going to be some
>  transform somewhere, and transforming to the second batch is no harder than the first.

Fair enough... though... Henry does seem to be concerned with how
it looks a s RDFa markup. I haven't thought thru what the 2nd
batch looks like if you go back to RDFa.


> then
> 
> all the following is true as well:
> 
> 
> 
> _:b1234 owl:sameAs "1234"^^xsd:int .
> 
> _:b1234 owl:sameAs "TU"^^:base64;
>      owl:sameAs "4D2"^^:hex ;
>      owl:sameAs "1234"^^:dec ;
>      owl:sameAs "2322"^^:oct ;
>      owl:sameAs "11010010"^^:bin .


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 22 February 2010 18:28:52 UTC