- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:47:12 +0100
- To: martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org
- Cc: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>, goodrelations <goodrelations@ebusiness-unibw.org>
On 13 February 2010 13:02, Martin Hepp (UniBW)
<martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
> Or should we use foaf:topic instead? If so, in which direction?
>
> Alternative 1:
>
> foo:microsoft a gr:BusinessEntity;
> gr:legalName "Microsoft Corp.".
>
> <http://www.microsoft.com/> foaf:topic foo:microsoft.
>
> Alternative 2:
>
> foo:microsoft a gr:BusinessEntity;
> gr:legalName "Microsoft Corp.";
> foaf:topic <http://www.microsoft.com/>.
>
> I personally think that the second alternative is wrong, because the data
> entity does not describe the Web page, but vice versa.
Agreed.
Personally I'd opt for a tweak to Alternative 1:
foo:microsoft a gr:BusinessEntity;
gr:legalName "Microsoft Corp.".
<http://www.microsoft.com/> foaf:primaryTopic foo:microsoft.
see
http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_primaryTopic
there is also the inverse
http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_isPrimaryTopicOf
Cheers,
Danny.
--
http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Saturday, 13 February 2010 12:48:35 UTC