On 13 February 2010 13:02, Martin Hepp (UniBW) <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > Or should we use foaf:topic instead? If so, in which direction? > > Alternative 1: > > foo:microsoft a gr:BusinessEntity; > gr:legalName "Microsoft Corp.". > > <http://www.microsoft.com/> foaf:topic foo:microsoft. > > Alternative 2: > > foo:microsoft a gr:BusinessEntity; > gr:legalName "Microsoft Corp."; > foaf:topic <http://www.microsoft.com/>. > > I personally think that the second alternative is wrong, because the data > entity does not describe the Web page, but vice versa. Agreed. Personally I'd opt for a tweak to Alternative 1: foo:microsoft a gr:BusinessEntity; gr:legalName "Microsoft Corp.". <http://www.microsoft.com/> foaf:primaryTopic foo:microsoft. see http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_primaryTopic there is also the inverse http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_isPrimaryTopicOf Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.nameReceived on Saturday, 13 February 2010 12:48:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:16 UTC