Thanks Reto and Sandro, these were very helpful answers. Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: > > I think there are many cases where the typical representation of the > information contained in a graph does not implies displaying literal > values without applying a function dependent on there location in the > graph. > Sandro Hawke wrote: > I don't think the notion of datatype is right to use this way. A > datatype is (roughly) a mapping from a lexical space to a value space, > and in the case you're talking about, the mapping for passwords would be > the same as xs:string, so I think it should be the same datatype. > > > > I think the lightest-weight approach here is to annotate the password > property. Rather than: > > eg:password rdfs:range eg:password > > say > > eg:password eg:displayType eg:blanked > > or something like that. As an aside on the datatype not defining the mapping ... RDF datatypes definitely do ... (even if we reused the XML Schema ones that seemed a bit funky in that regard). JeremyReceived on Friday, 5 February 2010 10:12:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:16 UTC