- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:43:05 +0000
- To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 18:43:38 UTC
Hi Michael > May I ask what you mean by "valid RDF" here? > any RDF which does not validate > > You refer to "many validators"? Which? There are, indeed, many, for > different languages. Do you only mean the RDF validators? > sorry, maybe that was incorrect, I took the word validators from third tab on this page http://pedantic-web.org/ > > Maybe you can provide a serious example for what you mean by /invalid/ RDF? > By "serious" I mean something that could really be found in some document > on > the web, where people believed that it would be valid, but it isn't (no > typos). > I personally have limited experience with RDF but I remember once one of the RDF elements (fields? properties?) was supposed to be a URI but the RDF generator we used did not specify it had to be uri, so we entered a word (literal?) and validation failed, when a valide URI was entered, the RDF validated I am sure the pedantic people will have compiled a catalogue of reasons why validation fails? hope I address your questions P > > > -- >
Received on Monday, 19 April 2010 18:43:38 UTC