W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2010

Re: call to arms - planting tomatoes

From: adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:59:58 +0100
Message-ID: <w2ke8aa138c1004180759y3ad54e4fvd995291c7a6fe0cf@mail.gmail.com>
To: "K. Krasnow Waterman" <kkw@mit.edu>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Utility value:-
Actually I was on a walk the end of last year with someone who had been the
editor for agricultural affairs on BBC World Service. I hope I have the
correct title. This was cut as the BBC thought that agricultural news was
covered in current affairs programs if it was significant enough.
He pointed out to me that agricultural news is not current affairs. What
happened in the agricultural programs was that if, say, a seed supplier
introduced a new seed then the use and benefits of this could be discussed
by having a few people from different regions on air.
I have to say at this point I cannot see any semantic web alternative to
this for the obvious reason that the radio is accessible, the internet is
Moreover, such a regional representative discussion (they would be experts
in local conditions) cannot easily be replicated either.
That said, I'm sure the semantic web will have some contribution to make in
this area?


On 18 April 2010 15:29, K. Krasnow Waterman <kkw@mit.edu> wrote:

> Perhaps I'm too literal, but when I think about linked data, I think about
> linking existing data (rather than having it created in response to a
> request, as social networking would require), and mostly about collapsing
> lots of searches into one.
> So, assuming Danny's request doesn't literally mean "my" tomatoes (as in,
> guess which varietal and what state they're in now), here are the searches
> I'd expect to do today and the results I'd hope linked data could bring me.
> 1) Find a tomato grow zone map or database (see, e.g.,
> http://www.tomatofest.com/tomato-growing-zone-map.html)
> 2) Find my location on that map and fetch my zone number
> 3) Find out the names of tomatoes that grow in my zone number
> 4) Get basic adjectives about those varieties (e.g., sweet, thin-skinned,
> drought-resistant)
> 5)a) Find the "planting season" for each variety for my zone number
> OR
> 5)b)i) Find out how long it takes for each variety to grow from seedling to
> fruit-bearing
> 5)b)ii) Find out how long it takes for each variety to grow from seed to
> seedling (this info tends to be provided in different places from #4)
> 6) "Rinse and repeat".  Grow zone maps have variation (by seed vendor and
> gardening expert), so I'd typically look at a few and work out a blended
> average sort of understanding.
> 7) Build a little table that puts this together (which would be so much
> better than the notes I scratch on the back of an envelope while I'm
> reading)
> Today this would probably take me 2+ hours of searching.
> I understand that there's no magic to producing this as a linked data query
> (no NLP that's going to produce my query so clearly and no algorithm that's
> going to implement it so perfectly), but I think building out more of these
> as demonstrations lets the business and government communities see the
> efficiency, effectiveness, and user wow factor.  If Burpee can help
> prospective gardeners reduce the time to understanding from hours to
> moments, won't they expect significantly more "conversions" from hits and
> reap the "first mover advantage"?  That's what provides the incentive for
> bigger players to publish more data, build more linked queries, and spend
> resources on the bigger picture -- my answer for an early question in the
> thread of last few days about how to get more engagement.
> Thanks, -k
> -----Original Message-----
> From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Dan Brickley
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 9:17 AM
> To: Danny Ayers
> Cc: Semantic Web
> Subject: Re: call to arms
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 18 April 2010 12:54, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de> wrote:
> >> Danny Ayers wrote:
> >>
> >>>when do I plant my tomatoes?
> >>
> >> We are in early Spring now. Tomatoes don't grow well in this period. At
> >> least not in the outside. Well, you can find them in the greenhouse, but
> >> that's probably not what you are looking for. So, I'm afraid, you have
> to
> be
> >> patient.
> >
> > Thank you Michael, but I wish to make you redundant. This box of
> > circuits in front of me should have told me that.
> >
> > Did you take into consideration that I live on this side of the
> > Garfagnana valley?
> When I think about linked information these days, I see three major
> flavours:
> * information in classic document form (analog stuff made of bits;
> human-oriented prose, video, imagery)
> * information in source-attributed RDF claims (aka Linked Data, quads, etc)
> * information in people's heads
> For me, the RDFWeb/FOAF story I think has always been about the 3-way
> relationship between these different equally important ways of
> learning about the world. Linked people *and* linked information.
> You can think of lots of aspects of SemWeb as positioned as edges of
> this simple triangle where the nodes are the categories above. RDF
> syntaxes, GRDDL for microformats, RDFa, Adobe XMP, ebook metadata,
> Dublin Core etc are often links between classic document forms and RDF
> quads. Sometimes RDF quads are more to summarise what the document
> says about the world; other times they are to help find it. Similarly,
> provenance, authorship and other people-describing RDF, also
> people-describing non-RDF information, can all help us to find whose
> *head* might have the right information. A YouTube video can capture
> something of a person's subjective knowledge of the world and put it
> out there in document form for others to find; tags and RDF stuff can
> help others find that video and either learn directly or get in touch.
> SemWeb people (all of us) can easily focus only on one of these forms
> of information, at the expense not only of the other two, but their
> rich interconnections. Machine-unfriendly video, images, audio or .xls
> files can still be very useful, and the 'RDF as metadata about files'
> use case is one we too easily neglect.
> > Did you take into consideration that I live on this side of the
> Garfagnana
> valley?
> In this case I think the answer is best found in the heads of your
> neighbours, rather than on the Web. How's your Italian coming along?
> cheers,
> Dan
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2010 15:08:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:17 UTC