- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:28:51 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
I've just re-read "Weaving the Web" (strongly recommended). Not the only nutcase in this zone. On 11 April 2010 18:55, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote: >> Apologies for ranting on list. >> >> But... > > ...but you do have a point. It is about time the payoff from these > technologies was more tangible, or we figured out what's > not-quite-right. > > Re ranting, there's always IRC for that; #swig irc.w3.org is as good a > place as any to let off steam... > > Talking of which, may I remind everyone that you have a short (very > short - not sure exactly though) while left to submit something to > W3C's upcoming RDF Next Steps workshop, see > http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/cfp > > "...It is therefore time to consider whether a revision of the 2004 > version of RDF is necessary or whether the community can continue > developing with the current version." > > "Please, use the online form to make your submission, no later than 2010-04-11." > > The form is at http://cgi.w3.org/cgi-bin/ops/rdf-ws/ ("*Paper (pdf, > text file, html, or zip/gzip archive), hmm since when did PDF take > precedence over HTML around here?)" ... but I'm not sure what timezone > the 2010-04-11 constraint lives in. My guess is if the form closes at > midnight, it will be Boston midnight. Either way, if you have views on > where RDF should go next, this is a chance to make sure W3C takes them > into consideration when planning the next stage of the SemWeb > activity. > > cheers, > > Dan > -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Sunday, 11 April 2010 18:29:24 UTC