W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > April 2010

Re: mad as a hatter

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:28:51 +0200
Message-ID: <q2t1f2ed5cd1004111128j11d62384re7b3822137a6517c@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
I've just re-read "Weaving the Web" (strongly recommended). Not the
only nutcase in this zone.

On 11 April 2010 18:55, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Apologies for ranting on list.
>> But...
> ...but you do have a point. It is about time the payoff from these
> technologies was more tangible, or we figured out what's
> not-quite-right.
> Re ranting, there's always IRC for that; #swig irc.w3.org is as good a
> place as any to let off steam...
> Talking of which, may I remind everyone that you have a short (very
> short - not sure exactly though) while left to submit something to
> W3C's upcoming RDF Next Steps workshop, see
> http://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/cfp
> "...It is therefore time to consider whether a revision of the 2004
> version of RDF is necessary or whether the community can continue
> developing with the current version."
> "Please, use the online form to make your submission, no later than 2010-04-11."
> The form is at http://cgi.w3.org/cgi-bin/ops/rdf-ws/ ("*Paper (pdf,
> text file, html, or zip/gzip archive), hmm since when did PDF take
> precedence over HTML around here?)" ... but I'm not sure what timezone
> the 2010-04-11 constraint lives in. My guess is if the form closes at
> midnight, it will be Boston midnight. Either way, if you have views on
> where RDF should go next, this is a chance to make sure W3C takes them
> into consideration when planning the next stage of the SemWeb
> activity.
> cheers,
> Dan

Received on Sunday, 11 April 2010 18:29:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:17 UTC