- From: Martin Hepp (UniBW) <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:32:34 +0200
- To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Ian Davis <Ian.Davis@talis.com>, Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>, Mary Ayers <mary.ayers@onetel.net>
- Message-ID: <4AA91C12.4000303@ebusiness-unibw.org>
Dear Danny: Apologies for the delay ;-) > Looking again at the vocab, the only significant part I'd do > differently is ProductOrService (and similarly structured related > classes). While in the context of selling stuff this combination fits > well, there are big differences nearby, e.g. physical characteristics, > means of delivery. > > You are right, gr:ProductsAndServices and its subclasses combine objects of two different kinds - basically, - objects - "things that can be claimed to exist" (Proton) - happings Products are basically all objects on which property rights can be obtained and transferred, while Services are basically happenings that take place in the favor of someone and. So the natural modeling would be a class gr:Product and a class gr:Service. GoodRelations uses gr:ProductOrService, which is union of those two classes, because with many important data sources, it is difficult to distinguish the products from the services automatically and reliably. Remember, we often have shop systems with several 100k items, and very often a few percent of the entries are services. It is basically a trade-off decision between the ease of populating the ontology vs. maximizing the reuse of the data. See also http://www.heppnetz.de/files/iswc-lightning-talk-hepp3.png Another reason is that from the commercial perspective, there are many properties that are to be attached to both products and services, so we need the superclass anyway. I expect now a lot of counterarguments from people who worked on fine-grained modeling of services ;-) Before anybody sends flames, please note that GoodRelations aims at services only insofar as "commodity services", like hairdressing, waste disposal, cleaning, etc. is concerned. Best Martin PS: See recent stats on GoodRelations adoption at http://pingthesemanticweb.com/stats/types.php -- -------------------------------------------------------------- martin hepp e-business & web science research group universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen e-mail: mhepp@computer.org phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) skype: mfhepp twitter: mfhepp Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! ================================================================= Webcast: http://www.heppnetz.de/projects/goodrelations/webcast/ Recipe for Yahoo SearcMonkey: http://tr.im/rAbN Talk at the Semantic Technology Conference 2009: "Semantic Web-based E-Commerce: The GoodRelations Ontology" http://tinyurl.com/semtech-hepp Overview article on Semantic Universe: http://tinyurl.com/goodrelations-universe Project page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ Resources for developers: http://www.ebusiness-unibw.org/wiki/GoodRelations Tutorial materials: CEC'09 2009 Tutorial: The Web of Data for E-Commerce: A Hands-on Introduction to the GoodRelations Ontology, RDFa, and Yahoo! SearchMonkey http://tr.im/grcec09
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 17:44:05 UTC