Re: RDF 2 Wishlist

Dave Raggett wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Simon Reinhardt wrote:
>> Toby Inkster wrote:
>>> a) Tt would remove the restriction on subjects being literals.
> ...
>> But that doesn't work with
>>     "foo" ex:predicate "bar" .
> Doesn't that depend on the predicate, e.g. how about a predicate that is 
> true if the subject and object are both string literals and the subject 
> is shorter than the object.
> e.g.     "a"  ex:shorterThan "aaa"
> where such statements should be the result of an inference.

Sure, or computed properties [1].
But my comment was more about the fact that Toby's idea of creating inverses for compatibility doesn't work when both sides are literals.



Received on Monday, 2 November 2009 11:18:41 UTC