- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 23:20:26 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Andreas Harth <andreas@harth.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@inf.puc-rio.br>, David Huynh <dfhuynh@alum.mit.edu>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
2009/5/31 Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>: > Box 1: A journey exploring information about presidents, their kids and > their education... > box 1.1: All things that are US presidents > box 1.2: All things that are children of things in bag_1.1 > box 1.3: All things that are educational institutions, attended by things in > bag 1.2 > bag1.4: All things that are places that are locations of things in bag > 1.3... > > Box 2: A journey into info about hong kong skyscrapers, their designers, and > the buildings those designers have made > box 2.1: All things that are skyscrapers in Hong Kong > box 2.2: All things that are the architects of things in bag 2.1 > box 2.3: All things that are buildings designed by things that are in bag > 2.2 ...etc > > Note: each sub-box is an RDFesque expression couched in terms of types and > relations, with a reference to the set of things handed along from the > previously box. In theory each of these could also evaluated with different > "according to..." criteria, which could map into SPARQL GRAPH provenance, > different databases, or various other ways of indicating who-said-what. Not thought this through, but first impression is that this sounds like what you could get using CONSTRUCTs on the wider space to build a local graph-box (fairly transparent, more filtering than transforming), and CONSTRUCTing again on that until there's just a wee bit left which could be rendered using SELECT etc. Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Sunday, 31 May 2009 21:22:07 UTC