- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:05:59 +0100
- To: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Cc: Libby Miller <libby@nicecupoftea.org>, martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>, "semanticweb@yahoogroups.com" <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 20 May 2009, at 15:48, Yves Raimond wrote: > Hello! > >> Not very linked data friendly (you'll end up with a large >> proportion of >> repeated triples in identical graphs, with different graph URIS), but >> certainly better than nothing. > > Just jumping on that - is that an issue? I would think not, as you may > want to repeat information across different views. For example > (slightly biased :-) ), you may want to repeat broadcast information > in a schedule view, instead of asking the user agent to manually get a > hundred of URIs. It's not ideal if you're crawling that data - you'd end up with many thousands of copies of an (almost?) identical document. But with no obvious clue that they're the same. I didn't look at what was going on in the HTTP, but using the right 40x forwards it could make it clear to the client what's happening. - Steve -- Steve Harris Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK +44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 15:06:34 UTC