- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:19:10 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>, Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Hi Dan, I've only just got round to reading this, so thanks for all the links. This is very exciting -- I wasn't aware of DC profiles until Peter blogged about my UK gov/RDFa work and made reference to it. And I certainly hadn't come across the notion of 'pidgin languages' in relation to vocabularies, until you mentioned it here. So this is a great set of links to prod further thinking. Thanks! Regards, Mark On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > On 8/5/09 12:45, Damian Steer wrote: >> >> On 7 May 2009, at 20:40, Mark Birbeck wrote: >> >>> I've used the term 'argot' to describe a collection of terms for a >>> particular purpose. They don't necessarily all belong to the same >>> vocabulary, but by grouping them together, it makes it easier for >>> people to get a handle on the terms that they might use in a >>> particular context. >> >> By the sounds of it this is much the same as an 'Application Profile' >> [1] in the DC community. I tried using OWL (+ closed world reasoning) to >> express them, which sounds similar. Your term has the virtue of brevity, >> and I may steal it :-) > > Bruce Sterling defines argot as > > "the deliberately hermetic language of a small knowledge clique... a > super-specialized geek cult language that has no traction in the real > world." --http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argot > > Sounds about right! ;) > > Re OWL/SPARQL and integrity checks, see also > http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2009/02/11/integrity-constraints-for-owl/ and > http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2009/05/07/owl-integrity-constraints-serql-and-new-sparql/ > plus the old schemarama stuff that built on query languages, > http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/02/schemarama/ and (seemingly offline) > http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/schemarama/how.html > > Once upon a time, some of us had an EU project proposal that included the > creation of a "recipies" directory, linking instance examples, SPARQL > queries and practical use cases. The EU reviewers in their infinite wisdom > sent the taxpayer's euros elsewhere, but I still have fondness for the idea. > > Re DCMI (and cc:'ing Tom Baker) it's certainly true that the Dublin Core > effort in recent years has emphasised the combination of independently > maintained vocabularies, rather than trying to address all needs through > directly extending DC. > > * BTW if you hurry you can get a paper into the next DC conference, which > closes today: http://www.dublincore.org/ * > > I encourage folk interested in this topic to take a look at the drafts on > the Dublin Core site: > > * Description Set Profiles: A constraint language for Dublin Core > Application Profiles. > * A MoinMoin Wiki Syntax for Description Set Profiles. > * Guidelines for Dublin Core Application Profiles. > > all linked from http://www.dublincore.org/documents/ but here are the links > to save a click: > http://www.dublincore.org/documents/2008/03/31/dc-dsp/ > http://www.dublincore.org/documents/2008/10/06/dsp-wiki-syntax/ > http://www.dublincore.org/documents/2008/11/03/profile-guidelines/ > > Also re argot, see also Tom's papers re DC as a pidgin language, > http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/baker/10baker.html > http://www.dl.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/ISDL97/proceedings/thomas/thomas.html > > "Either way, real pidgins are living languages that continually evolve > through use in public speech and the mass media. If pidgin metadata is not > to be constrained too tightly by its own rules from evolving naturally, it > will need a mechanism that supports such collective, ongoing negotiation." > (this was back in 1997!) > > Maybe some combination of wikis and sparql could provide such a mechanism? > > cheers, > > Dan > > >> [1] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_profile> >> >> > > -- Mark Birbeck, webBackplane mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number 05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street, London, EC2A 4RR)
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 11:19:51 UTC