- From: David Baxter <retxabd@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:06:34 -0500
- To: semantic-web@w3.org, phayes@ihmc.us
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:18:53 UTC
Pat Hayes said: > I know both Cyc and dbPedia say their > concepts are sameAs one another, but they are both wrong. Cyc defines > a 'piece' of carbon; dbpedia defines the chemical element carbon. > These concepts are NOT owl:sameAs one another, no matter what the > websites say. Hi Pat, We're definitely interested in improving the quality of our owl:sameAs links to DBpedia and other datasets. In this case, however, I believe the owl:sameAs link is good -- it's the OpenCyc comment that's bad. The URI opencyc:Carbon <http://sw.opencyc.org/concept/Mx4rvVjIQpwpEbGdrcN5Y29ycA>denotes an owl:Class representing the element carbon. Its instances are individual pieces of carbon, including diamonds and lumps of coal. We'll get the comment fixed. David Baxter Cycorp
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 14:18:53 UTC