- From: James Prentice <prentice.j.a@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:18:06 -0700
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ed53d6e20906231618k620856eq66c8f87532d362eb@mail.gmail.com>
I have a very newbie question I'm hoping someone can clarify. Say I'm creating an ontology and have several namespace declarations because I want to use some defined vocabularies, e.g. foaf:http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ and owl:http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#. Maybe I want to use foaf:mbox and owl:sameAs. My question is, how are the foaf and owl definitions located? Since URIs are not always resolvable, or may be resolvable to something other than the ontology itself, I'm wondering how they are loaded when I do something like run the Pellet reasoner on my ontology in Protege. Does it look up the URI in some common repositories and try to load from there? On a related note, I was confused by this paragraph from http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#imports-def "Although owl:imports and namespace declarations may appear redundant, they actually serve different purposes. Namespace declarations simply set up a shorthand for referring to identifiers. They do not implicitly include the meaning of documents located at the URI. On the other hand, owl:imports does not provide any shorthand notation for referring to the identifiers from the imported document. Therefore, it is common to have a corresponding namespace declaration for any ontology that is imported." Namespace declarations don't *only* set up shorthand, do they? If I declare the foaf namespace and then refer to foaf definitions in my ontology, at some point the foaf ontology has to be loaded. I don't see a large difference between namespace declarations and imports. I'm very confused by this issue, so it's possible that my question doesn't even make sense. :-) Thanks for any clarification of this issue. Cheers, Jim
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 08:22:01 UTC