Agreed. Go for CC0. Disclaimers are an orthogonal issue I *hope*. On 2009-06 -08, at 00:13, Marc Wick wrote: > >>> Added some words in the about - any advice as to what the licence >>> might be? >>> I guess there is some cc licence that corresponds to: >>> "The information is provided as-is and without any warranty. >>> It is freely available for any use as you wish." >> I would suggest you want the Open Database Licence [1]. >> [1]: http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/ > > Definitely not. The Open Database License is a kind of share-alike > license. share-alike does not work for data and cannot be considered > open. It prevents nearly all interesting use cases and is the > contrary of "freely available for any use as you wish". > The cc0 licenses Nathan is suggesting are more what you are looking > for. > > Best > > Marc
Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 11:46:11 UTC