- From: Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@inf.puc-rio.br>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:23:38 -0300
- To: Sherman Monroe <sdmonroe@gmail.com>
- CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, David Huynh <dfhuynh@alum.mit.edu>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
Sherman, as another alternative, I urge you to take a look at Explorator [1] (there is a short movie explaining the basic idea, you can also play with the live interface), which can do all of what you said, and more. It provides a more general exploration paradigm, of which the example you give below is only one of the possibilities... Best Daniel [1] http://www.tecweb.inf.puc-rio.br/explorator. Sherman Monroe wrote: > Dan, > > ... > As for pivoting and set-based browsing in general, it's a very novel > paridigm that requires more study, espeically user-oriented studies. > It's easy to mis-apply old methods to this new UI approach, for > example, how Parallax creates a 1-dimensional (i.e. 2-directional) > breadcrumb trail. This is borrowed from WWW browsing, where the only > directions from the "subject" (i.e. web page loaded) is back and > forward. But in a linked database, the number of directions from a > subject is equal to the number of possible types of the links from > that subject to its objects. So it's a truly n-dimensional hyperspace. > Thus, the 2D-breadcrumbs trail, while helpful, does not truly orient > user's current position in the database. Here is my attempt to > describe how navigating the linked dataspace would feel in real life, > to better bring out the point. Image a linked database as a building, > and each room contains a set of one or more resources matching a > SPARQL criteria, and along the walls of the room are portals leading > to other rooms, where each portal represents an RDF property those > resources share. Now say I'm browsing a social network database, and > I'm in DanBrickley's room, and I open and enter his *foaf:knows* > portal. Now I am in /DanBrickley >> foaf:knows/ portal. The portals in > here represent all the properties shared by all the folks Dan knows. > Where can I go? I can go back through the DanBrickley portal, or > through one of the property portals. Now here is the magic introduced > by the structured XML SPARQL query. Suppose that from here, I want to > enter the *foaf:interest* portal. In there, I see /semantic web/. Now > I kick out all the other resources in this room, so that only semantic > web remains. If I go back into the *foaf:interest* portal through > which I came, I now find this list of friends is narrowed to just > those whose interest is semantic web. The abilty to manipulate a room > and have it affect the state of all other rooms in my breadcrumbs, is > something you can't currently do with Parallax, because of it's 2D > navigational path (David or anyone, I make this statement after having > tried witht he interface myself, the browse all>> link on properties > is the cloest thing I found). Now from this room (the /friends whose > interest is semantic web/ room), I now go through the > *foaf:currentProject* portal. I have now forked my criteria (an > ability that was in Piggybank/Longwell, but missing from Parallax for > some reason). Here I find the /Umbel Project/. Because each resource > also acts like a portal (thanks to resource dereference :), I enter > the /Umbel Portal/, and now I'm in a new room inside a totally new > building containing rooms specialized around technology projects (a > building represents a SPARQL endpoint, linked database source, an RDF > graph, etc). So the portals can lead into/out of any building > imaginable. Parallax only allows for navigating inside one building, > i.e. Freebase, a second short coming. > > Not to pick on Parallax at all, it's outstanding work that must > continue to be pushed and improved, so I'm just here to whet the > concepts it introduces. I have found the above visualazation of the > linked database helpful in my work with linked data browsers, most > recently razorbase. I've toyed with the notion of a 3D linked data > browser along these principles, but don't know if that could actually > be more useful than simple tables for large audiences.
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 2009 02:24:17 UTC