- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:52:05 +0100
- To: "martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, "bnowack@semsol.com" <bnowack@semsol.com>
- CC: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
On 22/07/2009 14:32, "Martin Hepp (UniBW)" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: > > Benjamin Nowack wrote: >> Interesting. I guess this is another argument/example pro Hugh >> Glaser's idea of simply conflating resource IDs for the sake of >> "deployability". The example types <#business> as Vcard, Business >> and also as BusinessEntity which would usually be considered wrong >> RDF, but, as argued before, is more intuitive for HTML authors, >> especially if they found their way to the SemWeb through pragmatic >> solutions like microformats. We should really give this contextual >> semantics idea another thought. >> > Actually, I disagree completely. > Actually, not sure I agree either :-) Although being a little sloppy in the short term to "make the whole thing fly now" is not a bad attitude. "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good."? Hugh
Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2009 13:53:05 UTC