- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:48:01 +0200
- To: Toby A Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: kj@iteegosearch.com, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Kevin, I think you are being too strict. Indeed, if individuals are only created through some web-form, there must be some way of adding relations between them, or between individuals and data. Why is it so hard to assert an object-property relation between e.g. an employee and company in a web-form? I could easily create a drop-down list of all companies that exist in my triple-store. This list will show the names of companies, but when one of them is selected, and the form is submitted, is is actually the URI of the company resource that is sent back to the form handler. My rule of thumb is that I always use object properties, unless I don't want to say anything more about the value of that property. For instance, if I want to specify a 'name' that relates some person or company to a name, I can just use a datatype property since I don't really need to say anything else about the name. But relating a company to a product is different, because it may be useful for my application to say additional things about the product (e.g. price, cost, weight, name, category etc.). I need something to group all these additional things together, and therefore represent each product as an OWL individual as well. The relation between company and product should then be an object property. (NB: a datatype property for 'has_product' on a company individual with the value of the 'name' property of some product individual does not relate the company to the product according to the RDF/OWL semantics) Good luck, Rinke On 19 jul 2009, at 10:15, Toby A Inkster wrote: > On 19 Jul 2009, at 07:40, Kevin Jenkins wrote: > >> It’s my understanding that object properties link individuals via a >> property and that datatype properties link individuals to data >> (such as form input). [...] I have many properties in my ontology >> such as has-company-name, has-software-product, is-employee-of etc >> … my guess is these must be datatype properties because somewhere >> (I guess a web form) somebody has to name the company, choose the >> software product category from a list, indicate who the employer is >> etc. > > > That's not correct. > > An object property is a property that takes a resource (an object) > as its value. A datatype property is a property that takes a literal > (string, number, date/time, boolean, etc) as its value. > > e.g. > > <#kj> rdf:type foaf:Person ; > foaf:name "Kevin Jenkins" ; > foaf:mbox <mailto:kj@iteegosearch.com> ; > foaf:mbox_sha1sum "d610935545bb79ad673d5a5e7bd45a11f9b12128" ; > foaf:knows <#alice> . > > In the above, foaf:mbox and foaf:knows are object properties, while > foaf:name and foaf:mbox_sha1sum are datatype properties. (rdf:type > is also logically an object property, though I think OWL treats it > as a special case.) > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > > > --- Drs Rinke Hoekstra Leibniz Center for Law | AI Department Faculty of Law | Faculty of Sciences Universiteit van Amsterdam | Vrije Universiteit Kloveniersburgwal 48 | De Boelelaan 1081a 1012 CX Amsterdam | 1081 HV Amsterdam +31-(0)20-5253499 | +31-(0)20-5987752 hoekstra@uva.nl | hoekstra@few.vu.nl Homepage: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke
Received on Monday, 20 July 2009 07:48:39 UTC