W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > January 2009

Today's equivalent of CBD+URIQA? (was: Re: Schism in the Semantic Web community.)

From: Manos Batsis <manos_lists@geekologue.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:36:57 +0200
Message-ID: <497EE3C9.8000702@geekologue.com>
To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
CC: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>

Danny Ayers wrote:
> i.e. maximally exploiting HTTP

Ah, nailed. It's too bad I have fallen behind regarding the state of the 
art, but the most horizontally useful idea I've ever stumbled upon re 
semweb was CBD [1] plus URIQA [2]. Essentially CBD defined graph limits 
(what we do with, e.g., lazy collection loading in the object-relational 
world). URIQA was a fitting HTTP extension anyone could implement to 
acquire/exchange/CRUD those graphs.

So, what is today's equivalent of those two?

[1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/CBD/
[2] http://sw.nokia.com/uriqa/URIQA.html


Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 10:40:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:10 UTC