- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 19:15:48 +0000
- To: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <4a4804720912061115p79ad4f7cw99af6df2f17b52e3@mail.gmail.com>
Following further enquiry into some aspects of this thread I have come across an interesting (long) paper, Leveraging Knowledge reuse and system Agility in the Outsourcing Era Igor Crk, University of Arizona, USA Dane Sorensen, http://www.infosci-online.com/downloadPDF/pdf/ITJ4155_M28TbL5NcG.pdf (Not sure if requires campus level access or anyone can retrieve it, email if you need a copy and cant access it) At the very bottom of this paper, page 14, tables 3 and 4 show RDF constructs in relation to the MOF (metaobject facility) equivalent I find this comparison extremely helpful, since it helps me understand RDF properties in relation to other contructs I may also be familiar with (Object Model) I tried to retrieve the same tables from the sources cited in the paper, but did not find it immediately (didnt search much either) http://www.w3schools.com/rdf/default.asp Wonder if a table like this is a useful cognitive artefact to explain RDF, and wheter it already exists somewhere in the spects and I may have missed it before? (too much info perhaps) PDM On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>wrote: > > During Vocamp Glasgow, I tried to confront my difficulties in identifying > some domain range of few vocabularies that I started rdfizing as practice, > and from explosing my questions to a whole range of RDF doctors (thanks > Norm, Keith, Serge) two things emerged, that i did not know before > > 1) an entity (class, object, subject) does not necessarily have domain > /range > > Is that so, and what's the rule/ and possibly exceptions/ that can be > inferred and applied? > > that did not emerge at Vocamp > > > 2) Apparently a triple can be of two kinds: > > class:relation:class > > but also > class:attribute:value > > Of this i would like some confirmtion (is this right?), > Finally, finally, wouldnt' this ambiguity be confusing? > > i dont have a case study for this yet, but if this is true I suspect it > could cause some possible logical conflict/ambiguity > in semantic data model and its implementation > am I the only one thinking so? > > > Are the above points addressed in some RDF tutorial > > please enlighten! > thanks a lot > > PDM > > > -- Paola Di Maio ************************************************** The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. Bertrand Russell ************************************************** ***************************************************
Received on Sunday, 6 December 2009 19:16:36 UTC