Re: FOAF sites offline during cleanup - correction 19703 -> 197034

http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/ says text/turtle

http://www.dajobe.org/2004/01/turtle/ says application/turtle

Both say application/x-turtle should be used until the registration is
submitted. Maybe that's the right approach for now.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote:

> The tabulator code has
>
> sf.mediatypes['text/n3'] = {'q': '1.0'} // as per 2008 spec
>
> sf.mediatypes['text/rdf+n3'] = {'q': 0.5} // pre 2008 spec
> sf.mediatypes['application/x-turtle'] = {'q': 0.2} // pre 2008
> sf.mediatypes['text/turtle'] = {'q': 1.0} // pre 2008
>
> The application for text/n3 is pending, but I can't remember what he status
> of *turtle*.  I think it was switched to text/turtle, but not sure.
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 2009-04 -29, at 10:38, Ian Davis wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Hugh,
>>
>> http://southampton.rkbexplorer.com/models/void.ttl
>> is served up as text/plain -- could you serve it as text/n3 ?
>>
>> Thanks, Tim
>>
>
>
> Is text/n3 best or application/turtle? Neither are registered but
> application/turtle would be most accurate. I'm only asking because I'm
> currently serving up turtle from http://ol.dataincubator.org/ as
> text/plain and I'd like to fix that.
>
> Ian
>
>
>