- From: Ivan Mikhailov <imikhailov@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:04:59 +0700
- To: Eyal Oren <eyal@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Hello Eyal, > this benchmark is somewhat unfair as the relational stores have one advantage compared to the > native triple stores: the relational data structure is fixed (Products, > Producers, Reviews, etc with given columns), while the triple > representation is generic (arbitrary s,p,o). > > One can question whether such flexibility is relevant in practice, and if > so, one may try to extract such structured patterns from data on-the-fly. That will be our next big extension -- updateable RDV Views, as proposed in http://esw.w3.org/topic/UpdatingRelationalDataViaSPARUL . So we will be able to load BSBM data as RDF and query them via SPARQL web service endpoint; thus we will masquerade the relational storage entirely. Best Regards, Ivan Mikhailov, OpenLink Software http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 10:08:36 UTC