- From: Bob DuCharme <bob@snee.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:54:55 -0400
- To: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
That's perfect! (I was afraid that the answer would be simple enough to be embarrassing. I've never used rdf:value before.) thanks, Bob KANZAKI Masahide wrote: > Hi Bob, > > How about using rdf:value ? > >> If the use of the rdf:type object as a predicate is not a good idea, is >> there some convention (i.e. an existing predicate from an existing ontology) >> to represent the PCDATA of an element that has attributes that are also >> being represented by triples? >
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2008 15:53:43 UTC