- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 13:12:14 +0200
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <danbri@danbri.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>, <ivan@w3.org>, <parcher@fosi.org>
Peter, >I would be very interested in reading a full specification of >N3. Could you point me to one? Dunno, is http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/ 'full' enough? Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: semantic-web-request@w3.org >[mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Peter F. >Patel-Schneider >Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 1:07 PM >To: parcher@fosi.org >Cc: danbri@danbri.org; semantic-web@w3.org; ivan@w3.org >Subject: Re: SWIG F2F during W3C TPAC week, Oct 20/21 (Cannes, France) > > >From: Phil Archer <parcher@fosi.org> >Subject: Re: SWIG F2F during W3C TPAC week, Oct 20/21 (Cannes, France) >Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:50:25 +0100 > >> >> Dan, everyone, >> >> I wonder whether a possible topic for discussion might be... and I'm >> hesitating a little to write this... testing the water to determine >> interest in and willingness to create an update to the RDF specs. >> >> A few of things lead me to this: >> - There appears to be at least some dissatisfaction with RDF/XML >> - N3, whilst fully specified and understood, is not part of the >> formal specs > >I would be very interested in reading a full specification of >N3. Could >you point me to one? > >> - Named graphs have been discussed (a lot) with various solutions >> proposed although none adopted (at least formally) >> - The 10th anniversary is looming and maybe it's time for >at least a >> review >> - A lot of other technologies have been built off RDF >(OWL, now with >> 2.0 well on the way, SPARQL, RIF, RDFa POWDER, and more) >and these >> may well provide good feedback into the original core? >> I'm sorry to say that I'm not going to arrive until the Tuesday >> afternoon so I'm not going to be able to participate much in the >> discussion, but Ill get there as soon as I'm able. >> >> All the best >> >> Phil. >> >Peter F. Patel-Schneider >Bell Labs Research > >
Received on Monday, 1 September 2008 11:17:56 UTC