- From: <huma@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:00:24 +0200
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Zille Huma <zille.huma@upb.de>, semantic-web@w3.org
Thanks a lot Alan for the detailed response. I agree on the point that it is more in relation to what do you want to capture in ontology and how should it be used later on. I will surely look into the works that you have suggested. As far as my particular interest is concerned, i am actually working on business-IT alignment meaning thereby that business requirements can be aligned with IT services on the basis of underlying ontology. Shortly explained, it means that the web services provided by the IT domain have certain interface description. But so far the WSDL interface description provided does not satisfy the semantic requirements. So to describe the services semantically, we need to define some semantic description standard, e.g., visual contracts of web services with pre and post condition of service methods. Now my idea is to derive this semantic description on the basis of the underlying business ontology that may also contain standard behavior description which can help deriving the semantic interface description of the service. Now in this case, the ontology with standard behavior that i design might be merged with other ontologies when i have to extend the work to match and merge two different ontologies as a result of merger of two businesses. Similarly, as the service interface description has to correspond to the underlying ontology therefore the ontology needs to be consistent somehow. I still am not sure right now about how to proceed as i have just started to think in this direction. I would really appreciate if you would be able to give me some pointers in this direction as your experience in ontology work can help me a great deal. thanks once again. Zille
Received on Friday, 30 May 2008 09:25:44 UTC