- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 15:07:31 +0100
- To: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- Cc: martin.hepp@unibw.de, semantic-web@w3.org
KANZAKI Masahide wrote: > Martin, thanks for your suggestion. > > So changed the license to LGPL. I'm not an expert, too, but don't want > to cause side effects on ontologies that include (link to) this > stylesheet. Thanks for this change, I was about to suggest something similar. The whole area around GPL and ontologies is pretty unclear, so yep, LGPL or a document-oriented license probably makes most sense. cheers Dan > best, > > 2008/5/19, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@unibw.de>: >> I am no expert in OSS licensing, but I am pretty sure that some potential >> users will fear that linking their ontology to your GPL-licensed stylesheet >> may make the ontology become GPL, which in turn may make commercial users of >> the ontology fear that creating instance data that is linked to the ontology >> also becomes GPL. >
Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 14:11:38 UTC