- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 15:14:28 +0100
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- CC: Michael F Uschold <uschold@gmail.com>, Semantic Web Interest Group <semantic-web@w3.org>
Jim Hendler wrote: > (note reduced cc-list, wish everyone would do that) > > Fwiw, seems to me what we need is rdfs:sameas - with owl: sameas being a > special, more restricted, case - like rdf vs owl class defs > Not in my book. We then just have to ask rdfs:sameAs owl:sameAs owl:sameAs or rdfs:sameAs rdfs:sameAs owl:sameAs ? Oh ... maybe. We might end up with a hierarchy of equivalence relations. But managing that hierarchy would be even harder than managing just one. J
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 14:15:44 UTC